Rhode Island Supreme Court Rules on Police Pension Benefits

Article Sponsored by:

Want to target the right audience? Sponsor our site and choose your specific industry to connect with a relevant audience.

What Sponsors Receive:
Prominent brand mentions across targeted, industry-focused articles
High-visibility placements that speak directly to an engaged local audience
Guaranteed coverage that maximizes exposure and reinforces your brand presence
Interested in seeing what sponsored content looks like on our platform?
Browse Examples of Sponsored News and Articles:
May’s Roofing & Contracting
Forwal Construction
NSC Clips
Real Internet Sales
Suited
Florida4Golf
Click the button below to sponsor our articles:
Aerial view of the Rhode Island Supreme Court Building

News Summary

The Rhode Island Supreme Court has determined that the ex-wife of a deceased Providence police officer is not entitled to his surviving spouse benefits. The ruling emphasizes that survivor benefits are designated for current spouses, clarifying the definition of a surviving spouse under state law. This decision arose from a case involving a property settlement agreement and aims to reinforce legal standards for spousal benefits in future divorce proceedings.

Providence, Rhode Island

The Rhode Island Supreme Court has ruled that surviving spouse benefits from the pension of a deceased Providence police officer cannot be claimed by his ex-wife. The decision clarifies who qualifies as a surviving spouse under state law and reaffirms the priority of benefits for current spouses.

The case involved Marilyn Wilson, who, after divorcing her husband Milton in 1995, argued she was entitled to his survivor benefits based on an agreement made at the time of their divorce. The couple had entered into a property settlement agreement (PSA) stating that Milton would designate her as the beneficiary for his pension’s survivor benefits in exchange for her waiving certain rights. However, after Milton’s death in December 2020, the city of Providence began issuing survivor benefits to his second wife, Diane Wilson.

According to Rhode Island law (G.L. 1956 §45-21.3-1) and the Providence Code, survivor benefits are dictated to be paid to the officer’s dependent spouse, emphasizing the legal designation of “surviving spouse.” A Superior Court judge previously ruled against Marilyn’s claim for the pension benefits, stating her interpretation of the PSA was inconsistent with the statutory and ordinance definitions of a surviving spouse.

The Supreme Court upheld the lower court’s ruling, indicating that survivor benefits are specifically allocated to a current spouse rather than a former spouse. Justice Paul A. Suttell underscored that the characterization of these benefits as Marilyn’s “sole and separate property” had been a misinterpretation; the benefits are meant for Diane, the legal surviving spouse.

Marilyn contended that the final judgment of divorce entitled her to the pension benefits, but both the Superior Court and the Supreme Court disagreed. The court made it clear that benefits aimed at a surviving spouse cannot be claimed by an ex-spouse, reinforcing the legal framework that governs who qualifies for these benefits.

Diane Wilson’s attorney noted that this ruling primarily revolves around the interpretation of statutory law, determining that an ex-wife does not qualify as a current wife or surviving spouse. The implications of this decision could significantly influence future divorce proceedings and the treatment of pensions and benefits under Rhode Island law.

Background of the Case

Milton and Marilyn Wilson were married in 1980 and began to separate in 1994 when Marilyn filed for divorce. By the time the divorce was finalized in 1998, Milton had retired from the Providence Police Department. According to their property settlement agreement, he retained all pension rights except for the benefits outlined for Marilyn.

Milton remarried in May 2007 to Diane Wilson and remained married to her at the time of his death. After his passing, Marilyn sought to compel the city to pay her the designated survivor benefits, but the city upheld that it was legally obligated to pay the current spouse—Diane.

The Supreme Court’s ruling solidifies the principle that former spouses cannot stake a claim on benefits designated for surviving spouses, as mandated by Rhode Island law. This decision clarifies the legal definitions and expectations surrounding spousal benefits and sets a precedent for how such matters are handled in the future.

Deeper Dive: News & Info About This Topic

HERE Resources

Additional Resources

HERE PROVIDENCE
Author: HERE PROVIDENCE

Article Sponsored by:

Want to target the right audience? Sponsor our site and choose your specific industry to connect with a relevant audience.

What Sponsors Receive:
Prominent brand mentions across targeted, industry-focused articles
High-visibility placements that speak directly to an engaged local audience
Guaranteed coverage that maximizes exposure and reinforces your brand presence
Interested in seeing what sponsored content looks like on our platform?
Browse Examples of Sponsored News and Articles:
May’s Roofing & Contracting
Forwal Construction
NSC Clips
Real Internet Sales
Suited
Florida4Golf
Click the button below to sponsor our articles:

Construction Management Software for Contractors in Providence, RI

CMiC delivers a reliable construction management solution for contractors in Providence, RI, looking to enhance project execution and streamline financial operations. The software offers advanced reporting tools, real-time job tracking, and automated workflows, allowing contractors in Providence to optimize their business processes and improve overall efficiency.

Learn More about CMiC’s offerings here. 

Stay Connected

More Updates

Would You Like To Add Your Business?

Sign Up Now and get your local business listed!

WordPress Ads