US Blocks UN Resolution on Gaza Ceasefire Amid Dire Humanitarian Conditions

The humanitarian crisis in Gaza worsens as calls for a ceasefire echo globally.

News Summary

The United States has vetoed a UN resolution aimed at establishing an immediate ceasefire in Gaza, drawing criticism from the international community. With over two million people facing starvation due to aid bans, the veto marks a significant departure from the consensus among other Security Council members. The US claims the resolution could undermine diplomatic efforts, while various nations call for urgent action against the humanitarian crisis, highlighting a complex battle over aid distribution and military actions in the region.

US Blocks UN Resolution on Gaza Ceasefire Amid Dire Humanitarian Conditions

In a controversial move, the United States has **vetoed** a UN Security Council resolution that aimed to establish an **“immediate, unconditional, and permanent” ceasefire** in Gaza. This decision has sparked a wave of reactions, especially since all other 14 members of the **Security Council** were on board with the resolution. It also sought the **release of hostages** and the lifting of restrictions on humanitarian aid in the region, where conditions have become increasingly dire.

Concerns Over Aid Distribution

The veto comes at a time when **over two million** people in Gaza are facing the terrifying prospect of starvation, largely due to an **11-week Israeli ban** on aid shipments. The **Gaza Humanitarian Foundation** (GHF), which is supported by both the US and Israel, has taken on the responsibility of aid distribution but has faced heavy criticism and has even been involved in tragic incidents recently. This situation has led to mounting frustration from various international observers.

The Stand of the US and Its Allies

The US Ambassador to the UN, Dorothy Shea, voiced concerns that the resolution could potentially “**undermine diplomatic efforts**” aimed at achieving a ceasefire. The US has distinctively held a position that differs from the UK and EU, as it does not classify **Hamas** as a terrorist organization. Shea emphasized that any resolution requiring support must decisively condemn Hamas or advocate for its disarmament.

Growing Tensions and Reactions

The UK’s ambassador, Barbara Woodward, who supported the resolution, underlined the **“intolerable situation”** in Gaza and directed criticism towards Israel for its military operations and stringent aid restrictions. Woodward’s stance portrays the current humanitarian conditions as **“catastrophic”**, a sentiment echoed by many watching from the sidelines.

Casualties and the Start of Military Campaigns

Since the beginning of Israel’s military operations, which were ignited by Hamas attacks on **October 7, 2023**, the toll has been staggering. Approximately **1,200 deaths** have been recorded, with casualty figures soaring to at least **54,000 Palestinians** since Israel intensified its military actions on **March 18, 2025**. These grim statistics have fueled calls for urgent action and humanitarian relief.

A Veto History

This veto marks the seventh time that the US has blocked a Security Council resolution that pertains to ceasefire efforts that could have protective implications for Israel. Discussions surrounding a potential ceasefire have often been entangled with calls for the **release of hostages** held by Hamas, further complicating the humanitarian discourse.

International Perspectives

Several nations, including Algeria, Denmark, and Greece, co-sponsored the resolution and received backing from heavyweights like **Russia, China, and France**. France’s ambassador pointed out that the US veto was a blockade preventing the council from fulfilling its responsibilities toward peace and humanitarian assistance.

US Justifications and Criticism

The US Secretary of State, Marco Rubio, has defended the veto, claiming that the resolution would have only served to **embolden Hamas**. Israeli officials welcomed the US’s decision, asserting it fortifies their security and highlights the importance of dealing with the hostage situation. However, criticism from countries such as Pakistan and China has painted a different picture, accusing the US of granting Israel a degree of **impunity** and neglecting its duty to uphold international humanitarian law.

Calls for Inquiry

As the situation continues to deteriorate, there are ongoing demands for an **independent investigation** into the troubling incidents around aid distribution as well as the escalating violence faced by civilians in Gaza. The future remains uncertain as these complex dynamics unfold and the humanitarian crisis deepens.